Skip to content

A direct IT practice — Canadian professional firms

White Glove Request an introduction
Menu

Privacy law readiness

Get the technical side ready before a Law 25 or PIPEDA review.

Quebec’s Law 25 and the federal PIPEDA create real obligations around personal information—consent, incident notification, access records, and demonstrable safeguards. We are not privacy lawyers or certified auditors. What we do is the technical groundwork a privacy review actually asks for: access control, an encryption baseline, logging, and an inventory of where personal information actually lives.

Find out where personal information actually lives

Most privacy gaps start with an incomplete picture of where data sits, not with a missing policy document.

Data location inventory

Shared drives, mailboxes, line-of-business applications, and any device that stores or syncs personal information are identified in plain language your advisor can use.

Access mapping

Who can currently reach client, employee, or patient information is documented—often the first thing a review actually asks to see.

Third-party processors

Cloud applications and vendors that receive or store personal information on the business’s behalf are listed as a tracked dependency.

Baseline technical safeguards

A review looks for demonstrable safeguards, not intentions. Ordinary, well-maintained IT hygiene covers most of this ground.

Access and authentication controls

Multi-factor sign-in, least-privilege access, and account review are documented as evidence of the everyday practices already described in security essentials.

Encryption and device controls

Device encryption, secure disposal, and mobile-device safeguards are confirmed and recorded rather than assumed.

Logging and retention

What systems log, for how long, and who can review that log are clarified—an area reviews frequently probe.

What stays with your privacy advisor

Readiness support is not a substitute for legal judgment. Some decisions must stay with an accountable specialist.

Legal interpretation

Whether a specific practice satisfies Law 25 or PIPEDA, and what a privacy impact assessment must contain, is a legal or privacy-specialist determination—not ours to certify.

Breach notification decisions

Whether an incident triggers a mandatory notification obligation, and to whom, is a legal decision made with qualified counsel, supported by our technical incident record.

Formal attestation

We do not issue compliance certifications or attestations. Any required sign-off must come from a qualified, accountable assessor or legal advisor.

Prepare this

A useful conversation starts with simple facts.

  • Whether a privacy review or assessment already has a date
  • Systems and vendors known to hold client, employee, or patient information
  • Current multi-factor coverage and device-encryption status
  • Whether a privacy lawyer or specialist is already engaged
  • Any prior incident or access concern worth documenting now

Bring the context; keep credentials out of the message.

Request an introduction

Prepare a useful introduction

Describe the interruption, the change ahead, and how your team prefers to be kept informed. A short note is enough to begin a service-fit conversation.

Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*).

Never include passwords, keys, recovery codes, or account-access details.

Read the privacy policy to understand how this request will be handled.